“Homeless” Jagrup Brar MLA on New Year’s Day

W2TV: Jagrup Brar MLA Welfare Challenge (Day 1) from Sid Tan on Vimeo.

Coast Salish Territory, Surrey BC – Jagrup Brar is starting New Year’s Day 2011 on the streets looking for shelter and a warm meal as he begins the MLA Welfare Challenge. Brar, MLA for Surrey-Fleetwood, will have just $610, the welfare rate for an individual, to cover his expenses of housing, food, personal hygiene, transit and other expenses. His month of poverty began at Surrey Central Skytain at 11am New Year’s Day.

Lending Brar moral support at a media briefing were several dozen supporters including family members Rajwant (wife), Noor, Fateh (children) and sister-in-law Baljit Brar. Raise the Rates and a number of Surrey Partners will work together to provide and advise. They will ensure he has a valuable and insightful experience, learning first hand about poverty, inequality and “being on welfare.”

Raise the Rate’s statement on Jagrup’s Brar’s month living on welfare rates: “Raise the Rates recognizes Jagrup Brar’s commitment in living on only $610 for one month. We also realize that this will not be the same experience as a person who actually lives on welfare. He will start the challenge in good health and with adequate clothes; and his month on welfare rates will end after a month.”

www.raisetherates.org

http://mlawelfarechallenge.com

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

UPSCALE: The downside of gentrification (2011 CCAP SRO hotel report)

Download the 2011  Carnegie Community Action Project SRO hotel report: UPSCALE: The downside of gentrification

December 14, 2011

GENTRIFICATION IS WORSENING THE DOWNTOWN EASTSIDE HOUSING EMERGENCY. This is the conclusion of the Carnegie Community Action Project’s 4th annual hotel report, Upscaled, the Downside of Gentrification.

VANCOUVER, UNCEDED COAST SALISH TERRITORY:  Hotel rooms that used to be the housing of last resort for low income people, are being upgraded and rented to students and young workers at rents that low income residents can’t afford.  The annual survey of privately owned DTES hotels found that only 7% of rooms (235) are in buildings where all rents are $375 or lower, down from 12% in 2010 and 29% in 2009.

At least 700 people are literally homeless and living in DTES shelters, not counting people living on the streets or couch surfing says the report, released today. Thousands more live in about 3,500 privately owned SRO rooms. Many of these have deplorable conditions with poor management, rodents, cockroaches, bedbugs, and danger, especially for women, transgender people and people with health issues. Another 1,500 people live in government or non-profit owned SROs that are usually cleaner and better managed but are still tiny and don’t have private bathrooms or kitchens or meet modern earthquake standards.

This year CCAP’s fourth annual hotel report also found:

  • More hotels are excluding low income DTES residents from desperately needed housing by high prices and by class, racial and health profiling done by desk clerks;
  • The number of rooms in hotels where the lowest rent is $425 or more declined slightly (122 rooms) from last year;
  • The number of rooms in hotels where the lowest rent is $600 or more increased by 227 from last year;
  • Vacancies remain minimal with only two in rooms that rent for $375 or less;
  • At least 13 hotels charge between $200 and $375 extra when two

people share a tiny room;

  • More hotels seem to be renting illegally on a daily or weekly basis.

“We are seeing more discrimination based on class, race and health stereotypes,” said Ivan Drury, one of the report’s authors.  “For example, when I tried to rent a room at the Lotus, I was told that rent was $600 a month and a room would be available at the end of the month.  Fifteen minutes later Robert Bonner tried to rent a room and was told rent was $800 and there were no vacancies.”

“We also found that only 7% of the rooms are in hotels where all the rooms rent for $375 or less,” said Jean Swanson, co-author of the report.  “This is down from 12% last year and 29% in 2009,” she added.

Herb Varley, a York Hotel resident, said he fears that the new owner of his hotel will upscale the building so it is no longer affordable by low income residents.  “Where will people live when the rents go up?” he asked.

The report makes recommendations for all three levels of government, including:

  • The city should buy 10 sites a year for social housing in the DTES and stop condo development until all current DTES residents have decent housing;
  • The province should spend its $250 million Housing Endowment Fund on housing now, make rent control apply to the unit, not the person, and make “social condition” a prohibited grounds of discrimination in the Human Rights Code.
  • The federal and provincial governments should provide funds to replace 1000 SROs a year for the next 5 years with self contained social housing that current residents can afford.

The report is available at ccapvancouver.wordpress.com/2011/12/14/upscale/

For info, contact Ivan Drury (605 781 7346) or Jean Swanson (604 729 2380)

-30-

2 Comments

Filed under CCAP Reports

SRO hotel report to be released by Carnegie Community Action Project Wednesday

Media advisory
For Immediate Release
December 13, 2011

 Upscale, the Downside of Gentrification to be released on Wednesday

 The Carnegie Community Action Project will release its fourth annual hotel report at a news conference on Wednesday, December 14 at 11 am at the York Hotel, 259 Powell St.

Called, Upscale, the Downside of Gentrification, the report will inform readers:

  • How many privately owned Single Room Occupancy (SRO) hotel rooms are left that rent for the welfare shelter allowance of $375 per month;
  • How gentrification is contributing to homelessness in the DTES;
  • How many rooms are renting for over $600;
  • How many vacancies are in privately owned SRO hotels that rent for the welfare shelter allowance.

The report also suggests some reasons that homelessness has not been reduced in the last few years and makes action recommendations.

 –30—

 Contact Ivan Drury at 604 781 7346 or Jean Swanson at 604 729 2380.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Reports

Stop the 17-story condo development at 611 Main Street!

“Market and non-market housing must proceed apace…”

Stop the 17-story condo development at 611 Main St.

The Carnegie Community Action Project (CCAP) opposes the proposed 17-story condo tower project at 611 Main. We are asking that any condo project at 611 Main be put on hold, along with a general moratorium on all market condo development in the Downtown Eastside (DTES), until the housing and homelessness crisis in the DTES is stopped, until no body is forced to sleep in SRO hotels, shelters, or on the street, and until the assets and tenure of the low-income community are secured.

Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Filed under Stop Gentrification

Using Strings to Demonstrate the Distribution of Wealth in Canada

Get 100 inches of string.

Cut it in 4 pieces as follows:

The poorest fifth of Canadians are represented by nothing because they are in debt.

1 piece is 1.3 inches long representing the wealth of the second poorest fifth of Canadians;
1 piece is 6.9 inches long representing the wealth of the middle fifth of Canadians;
1 piece is 17.4 inches long representing the wealth of the second richest fifth of Canadians;
1 piece is 75 inches long representing the wealth of the richest fifth of Canadians;

Script

Say:  I am going to show the distribution of wealth in Canada using these strings.  I have one hundred inches of string representing 100% of the personal wealth in Canada.  It is cut into 5 pieces and each piece represents one fifth of the population of Canada, about 6 million people.

#1. Hold up nothing:  Say:  the poorest fifth of Canadians have no wealth.  They are in debt by an average of over $9000 for each family unit.

#2.  Hold up the 1.3 inch string:  Say:  the second poorest fifth of Canadians have this much wealth:  1.3%.

#3.  Hold up the 6.9 inch string:  Say:  the middle fifth of Canadians have this much wealth:  6.9%.

#4.  Hold up the 17.4 inch string:  Say:  the second to richest fifth of Canadians have this much wealth:  17.4 %.

#5:  Hold up the 75 inch string:  Say:  the richest fifth of Canadians have this much wealth:  75% .

Say:  this information is from a Statistics Canada report in 2006.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Better Incomes

Statement on the Mayors Debate

Vancouver, Unceded Coast Salish Territory: November 8, 2011

Three solutions to Vancouver’s housing and homelessness crisis

DTES housing activist responds to the Mayoral Debate

The mayoral candidates said a lot of things but they didn’t debate much at their debating debut on Sunday night. They both admitted that they will not slow down or pause destructive market development in the DTES. They agreed that a municipal tax on real estate speculation and non-resident property ownership would not be appropriate. And also that inclusionary zoning, a soft and widely used development permit mechanism that forces developers to include affordable housing in all market developments, would not be good for Vancouver. They even agreed that the solution to the affordable rental housing and homelessness crisis caused by the real estate market is to be found back in the market itself. Put bluntly their differences were of degree, not principle. For example, while they both agreed that the DTES should remain a low-income community “in the short term,” Anton was the only one of the two who dared to state that there should not be any more social housing built in the poorest off-reserve neighbourhood in Canada.

But the most troubling thing about the mayoral debate is that both candidates took on the low-income affordable housing and homelessness crisis by blaming the provincial and federal levels of government. Both Gregor Robertson and Suzanne Anton avoided the city’s roles in building housing, and city jurisdictions that could save low-income housing. These are the top-three things we believe a mayoral candidate would do if they were serious about ending the affordable rental-housing and homelessness crisis in Vancouver:
  1. Buy 10 sites a year in the DTES for 5 years and dedicate these sites for social housing to replace all 5,000 units of unsafe, unstable, unhealthy SRO hotel housing. Within social housing construction the city’s responsibility is to buy and provide land. As well as properties the city should buy any SRO hotel that comes available on the real estate market in order to remove all low-income housing from the hostile waters of the real estate market. City Council has not bought one single new property in the DTES for social housing in at least three years. Everyone recognizes there is a housing and homelessness crisis in Vancouver and the DTES in particular, but neither mayoral candidate is willing to buy the land necessary to build the housing.
  2. The city must close the holes in the SRA bylaw: Define “conversion” of SRO hotels as raising rents above welfare and pension-affordable rates of $375/month. The DTES low-income community is losing SRO hotel rooms, the last stop for most residents before the street, to developer greed and the city is helping by leaving loopholes in the SRA anti-conversion bylaw big enough to drop entire buildings through. By tying SRO hotel conversion to a dollar value city council would stand with low-income tenants against landlords who may be trying to squeeze more rent monies out of their investment properties and force those landlords to go through public application processes for exemptions to this bylaw. This simple action would cost Vancouver taxpayers nothing and would save thousands of units of low-income housing like the formerly low-income rooms in the Columbia, Lotus, Alexander Court, Golden Crown hotels which are now renting to students and young workers for more than double welfare shelter rates. It would also provide leadership to the provincial government to create effective rent controls in the Residential Tenancy Act to stop rewarding landlords with rent-increases without ceiling after evictions.
  3. Implement an immediate moratorium on market development in the DTES to allow the DTES Local Area Planning process, not developers and market forces, to direct the future of the neighbourhood.This solution will also cost taxpayers nothing and will have more than one powerful meaning for the low-income community in the DTES. Low-income residents of the DTES are reliant on low-income affordable housing, on the availability of services in the neighbourhood, and on affordable shopping options for food, clothes, and other necessities of life. Gentrification, the transformation of the neighbourhood block-by-block into higher-end shops and higher rents, more policing on the streets, the upscaling of hotels to students and young worker housing, threatens all these essentials. The city’s policy has been to encourage, reward, and even directly subsidize gentrifying developments: the uber-high-end Keefer bar and celebrity hotel received a $50,000 heritage grant and an award from city council; mega-corporations London Drugs and Nesters Market received a 10-year tax holiday from the city for setting up shop in the Woodward’s condo complex; and the London Pub and Brixton Cafe received $1.4Million in taxbreaks and kickbacks from council for their heritage development on the corner of Main and Georgia. A moratorium on market development would give the low-income community the breathing room necessary to work on getting the secure, safe, healthy social housing we all need rather than having to work to defend the substandard but affordable SRO hotel housing we currently have. A market development moratorium would also send a powerful signal to the DTES low-income community a powerful signal that their needs, interests, and future are being taken seriously by council and that the local area planning process is more than a token or placating gesture.

Amidst all the bombast about housing and all the claims about ending homelessness we hope that these top-three solutions get some attention. The mayoral candidates can take three real steps to end homelessness and take on the Vancouver housing crisis, and two of them don’t require spending a dime… but they will hurt the profit margins of the richest people in the city. This is, as they say, where the rubber hits the road. Homelessness may, yet again, be the issue of this election but is ending it the priority of either major candidate? We await their responses to these challenges.

Ivan Drury
Downtown Eastside Neighbourhood Council board of directors member
Carnegie Community Action Project

Leave a Comment

Filed under More Social Housing, Stop Gentrification

Stop Homelessness – Buy The York Rooms

DTES groups call on City Council to put the ACTION back in “Homelessness Action Week”

This “Homelessness Action Week” DTES groups are calling on the City of Vancouver to make some real anti-homelessness steps and buy the York Rooms SRO hotel at 259 Powell and tighen up the SRA bylaw to protect the low-income housing stock.

The DTES Neighbourhood Council, Carnegie Community Action Project and Pivot Legal Society believe that the low-income affordable rooms in the York are in grave and immediate danger of being lost and that the city must step in and prevent the loss of these rooms – the last stop residents have before homelessness. We also think this threat of loss of low-income housing at the York points to the haemorrhaging of low-income housing in the DTES through ‘soft-conversions’ into student and young worker housing, within the SRA ‘anti-conversion’ bylaw. It’s time for City Council to close the holes in the SRA bylaw.

Last week the York Rooms was bought by notorious hotel developers Steven Lippman and Christian Williams and we are worried about losing 34 more low-income, welfare and pension rate rooms from that building. In the last three years Steven Lippman has acquired at least three hotels that used to be core housing for low-income people and are now housing a different class of people. We fear that he has acquired other hotels too, and that he is sitting on them and waiting to do soft conversions into student and young worker housing. His record speaks for itself:

  • The American hotel: Lippman bought the empty American hotel and converted it into rooms for young workers and students with rents that start around $650. He got the city’s blessing to bypass the SRA anti-conversion bylaw by promising to council that 10 rooms would rent at $400 for 10 years.
  • The Lotus hotel: Lippman bought the Lotus earlier this year. In a survey CCAP conducted in the early summer a low-income Aboriginal resident was told there were no rooms available, and that rents began at $800 a month. A student-appearing white volunteer spoke to the same manager minutes later and was told he could move in on the first of the month. For him rent was quoted as $600 a month. This discriminatory renting practice was confirmed in a phone conversation between a CCAP employee and Steven Lippman on Tuesday October 4th. When asked how much a room in the Lotus would cost Lippman said, “It depends what you look like.”  And about the rumours that he had paid low-income residents a thousand dollars to move out of the Lotus he said, “I have never personally paid anyone to move out.” But he did not deny instructing his managers to pay residents one thousand dollars to move out. Instead, he scoffed and said, “That’s not eviction. They are making a free choice to go.”
  • The Golden Crown Hotel: According to news reports all the residents of the Golden Crown hotel were illegally evicted and coerced or tricked into signing a statement agreeing to leave the building in September 2009. Steven Lippman and Christian Williams bought the building, empty, two weeks later. Williams claimed in the media that they had been “lied to” by the former owner who claimed the building was already empty. But on October 4th Lippman only repeated, “I have never personally evicted anyone.” Regardless, the Golden Crown is now the premier “microloft” project in the DTES, where 200 sq ft rooms cost something like $900 a month.

On Sunday October 2nd the DTES Neighbourhood Council, Carnegie Community Action Project and Pivot Legal Society organized a meeting for tenants in the building to learn about their rights, about lawful and unlawful rent increases and evictions. Of the 32 or so residents in the building, 18 came to the last-minute meeting and all were anxious about the potential upscaling of their homes. One resident has lived in the York Rooms for more than 50 years.  In the Historic Area Heights Review, passed this spring at City Hall, Vancouver Council recognizes, “It is Council’s priority to build and protect adequate housing to address low-income, homeless and vulnerable people in our community.”  It is the mandate of council to step in and take action to save the housing at York Rooms.

Steven Lippmand has said, “I’m proud of the fact that I have never personally evicted anyone.” But his technical definition of “not personally evicting” residents rings pretty hollow for low-income residents who can no longer live in the buildings he has invested in and redeveloped as high yield landlord properties. We understand his stated plans for the York, to “fix up the building like I always do,” as a threat to the security of the building as a low-income community housing asset. Although he claims that he will not evict anyone, he also promises to “charge whatever rents the market will bear.”

For national homelessness week this year we want Vancouver City Council to move beyond breakfasts and rhetoric and take two meaningful steps towards stopping homelessness:

  1. Immediately buy the York Rooms: Based on his record and his statements we know that Steven Lippman will upscale the York Rooms as he upgrade it and the doors of the building will be forever closed to low-income residents. The former owner, Mr. Yet Wah Chan, wants the building to remain housing for low-income people. He has suggested to us that he might be willing to reverse the sale if the city will make an offer within his 30 day window to back out of his agreement with Misters Lippman and Williams. Removing the York Rooms from the market housing stock is the only way to protect the low-income rooms there and it is not too late for the city to act.
  2. Strengthen the SRA anti-conversion bylaw: Lippman-esque ‘soft conversions’ of SRO hotels from low-income / close-to-welfare-rate rents to student and young worker housing with more than double welfare rate rents and accompanying anti-poor discrimination is the way that low-income housing is being lost in the DTES. City Council has so far made zero steps to protect the low-income housing stock against these soft conversions. Instead, they have celebrated Steven Lippman’s conversion investment at the American hotel. The health and homes of low-income residents at the York and other hotels must be prioritized over the health of the real estate market.This Homelessness Action Week Vancouver City Council should finally close the loopholes in the SRA bylaw by quantifying “affordability” in the DTES as welfare and pension rate rents to really defend the low-income housing stock. By working with the province to amend the Residential Tenancy Act to place controls over rent increases in the low-income housing stock and tying those rents to welfare and pension rates council will be recognizing the crisis in housing in the DTES and taking real action to address it. Council will also show that stopping homelessness is a bigger priority to them than supporting real estate speculation and landlord profits. With an SRA anti-conversion bylaw with teeth the real estate value of SRO hotels could be suppressed and more easily bought by the city or province and removed from the real estate market.

This year, let’s put the action back in Homelessness Action Week.

DTES Neighbourhood Council board of directors and Carnegie Community Action Project.

Leave a Comment

Filed under More Social Housing, Stop Gentrification

Save Low-Income Housing at the York Rooms

For Immediate Release: October 19, 2011

Join DTES groups and SRO tenants to call for City and Province action to

Save low-income housing at the York Rooms

Contact: Ivan Drury, DTES Neighbourhood Council: 604-781-7346
Jean Swanson, Carnegie Community Action Project: 604-729-2380

VANCOUVER, UNCEDED COAST SALISH TERRITORIES: On Wednesday October 19th at 10am Downtown Eastside (DTES) groups and residents of the York Rooms hotel are gathering in front of the York Rooms hotel at 259 Powell out of concern that their housing is at risk since is has been recently bought by notorious SRO hotel “upscaler” landlord Steven Lippman.

In the past two years Steven Lippman has bought as many as seven hotels in the DTES and has upscaled the rents in most of them way above what low-income residents can afford. DTES Neighbourhood Council (DNC) board member Ivan Drury explains, “With city support Steven Lippman has threatened more than 300 units of low-income housing by upscaling them for students and young workers. The new social housing units that the government was celebrating during homelessness action week are just backfilling the hole made in the low-income housing stock by gentrifiers like Lippman. The number of units lost to this upscaling is almost exactly the same number of units that the city and province have bragged that they have built.”

Roger Hadder has only lived in the York Rooms for a few months but has spent most of the last nine years on the streets. “I lived homeless outside for seven years. Even though they’re not great, we really need these hotel rooms to rent at welfare prices,” Hadder said, pointing out the need for SRO hotels as transition places for people on the street, “If I couldn’t get a room in a hotel at welfare rate I’d still be on the street today.”

Damien Dubois, who has lived at the York for four years argued for rent controls and for a bylaw that holds SRO hotels at welfare and pension rate, “We need these hotels but they have to be at welfare shelter rate. At the York I’m paying $50 out of my support cheque for a tiny room. That just leaves me with $150 to live on for the month,” he said. “The only way it would be worse is if there was no welfare at all.”

The DNC will support tenants’ demand to owner lower rents to $375 a month and fix up the building for existing tenants. And together they are calling on the City of Vancouver and the Province of BC to:

  • CITY: Buy the York Rooms. Removing the York Rooms from the market housing stock is the only way to protect the low-income rooms there and it is not too late for the city to act.

  • CITY: Close the loopholes in the SRA bylaw to protect the low-income housing stock by adding to the definition of SRO Hotel “conversion”: Raising rents above welfare and pension rent rates;

  • PROVINCE: Implement effective rent controls in the SROs to stop evictions and the emptying and upscaling of buildings by investors;

  • PROVINCE: Fully fund the HEAT shelters immediately. The “Homelessness Action Week” announcement of 300 units of new social housing does not fill the need for shelter beds. Steven Lippman’s real estate investments alone have stolen almost as much low-income housing as has been built.

Carnegie Community Action Project (CCAP) coordinator Jean Swanson called for the city to put the action back in Homelessness Action Week and make affordable housing the most important issue of the civic election campaign. “What did we get out of Homelessness Action Week?” she asked. “A re-announcement of housing at the Remand Centre with only 24 units at welfare rate; A photo-op for the city and province at 1005 Station Street, a building cancelled in 2001; An announcement from the Province that they will not fund 4 of the HEAT shelters; and Kerry Jang’s embarrassing statement that the city (delete: he) is so close to ending homelessness he ‘can taste it.’ We still have about 700 people living in DTES shelters every night who desperately need homes, and that doesn’t count people living on the street.”

“The DNC has a five year plan to end homelessness in Vancouver and we have given it to the city for free,” said Drury: “Buy ten sites in the DTES for housing a year for five years and replace the SRO hotels as housing. Let them be temporary accommodations for people coming off the street or arriving in town. And do it now.”

- 30 -

Backgrounder: Why Steven Lippman’s purchase of the York Rooms worries us…

  • The American hotel (37 rooms): Lippman bought the empty American hotel and converted it into rooms for young workers and students with rents that start around $650. He got the city’s blessing to bypass the SRA anti-conversion bylaw by promising to council that 6 rooms would rent at $400 for 10 years.

  • The Lotus hotel (110 rooms): Lippman bought the Lotus earlier this year. In a survey CCAP conducted in the early summer a low-income Aboriginal resident was told there were no rooms available, and that rents began at $800 a month. A student-appearing white volunteer spoke to the same manager minutes later and was told he could move in on the first of the month. For him rent was quoted as $675 a month. This discriminatory renting practice was confirmed in a phone conversation between a CCAP employee and Steven Lippman on Tuesday October 4th. When asked how much a room in the Lotus would cost Lippman said, “It depends what you look like.”  And about the rumours that he had paid low-income residents a thousand dollars to move out of the Lotus he said, “I have never personally paid anyone to move out.” But he did not deny instructing his managers to pay residents one thousand dollars to move out. Instead, he scoffed and said, “That’s not eviction. They are making a free choice to go.”

  • The Golden Crown Hotel (28 rooms): According to news reports, residents of the Golden Crown hotel were illegally evicted and coerced or tricked into signing a statement agreeing to leave the building in September 2009. Steven Lippman and Christian Williams bought the building, empty, two weeks later. Williams claimed in the media that they had been “lied to” by the former owner who claimed the building was already empty. But on October 4th Lippman only repeated, “I have never personally evicted anyone.” Regardless, a news report now puts rent at the Golden Crown in the $650 to $825 range.

  • York Rooms (34 rooms): Steven Lippman fired and evicted the longtime residential manager immediately upon purchasing the York Rooms. And he also immediately got a construction crew to strip the ground floor storefront and basement and got an architect to draw up plans for a high-end restaurant and bar. Could upscaling and high rents for the upstairs rooms be far behind? In a phone conversation with a DNC organizer Steven Lippman said he would “charge whatever rents the market will bear.”

  • The DNC also believes that Lippman may also own Alexander Court with 59 rooms, and the Picadilly Hotel with 45 rooms. The Picadilly is still closed and the Alexander Court, after a suspicious fire, raised rents well above welfare rate. He also owns the London Hotel, with 73 rooms. He received a heritage bonus in the form of a 10-year property tax holiday, two facade grants, and a density transfer bonus from the City for his redevelopment, a massive incentive package totalling $1,374,131. Atira property management maintains the rooms at $375 a month but holds only a five-year lease, which ends, and leaves the rooms vulnerable to Lippman-style upscaling, in January 2014. The council motion that supported the renovation, for the purposes of heritage, to the tune of nearly $1.5million, qualified that if Lippman chooses to upscale the rooms the city will support the tenants in their moves out.

The DNC believes that Steven Lippman owns a total of 386 SRO hotel rooms that used to, or temporarily, rent to low-income people. These rooms have been upscaled or likely will be upscaled from low-income to student or young worker housing. While no one denies that students and young workers need housing in one of the most unaffordable cities in the world, we believe that this housing should not come at the expense of people who are one step away from homelessness.

During Homelessness Action Week 2011 the City of Vancouver and BC Housing cheered their accomplishment in building 388 units of low-income affordable supportive housing. Compared to the loss of 386 low-income affordable SRO units at the hands of Lippman alone, this surplus of two lonely units is hardly something to cheer. Add to that the other units lost to student and young worker “upscale” conversions and, in overall low-income affordable housing, our city is not keeping its head above water.

Leave a Comment

Filed under More Social Housing, Stop Gentrification

Community Arts Council of Vancouver

Mayor and Council
City of Vancouver

Dear Mayor Robertson and Councillors:
Re: Development of the Pantages Properties

The Community Arts Council has for some time supported the efforts of the
Pantages Theatre Arts Society and others to restore the theatre and to add non-
market housing to these properties in the 100 block East Hastings Street. It is too late to save the theatre but the vision remains: to have a facility for arts and
culture and thereby honour and renew the heritage of arts, cultural and
entertainment on this block; and to provide badly needed housing.

The CACV is extensively involved in the Downtown Eastside in supporting local organizations and residents in community arts programs. These include opportunities for local voices to express their experiences and dreams for the future, for building bridges amongst groups within the community and with the city as a whole. It is encouraging that additional non-market housing is coming on-line and that a local area planning program is planned for the Downtown Eastside. However the issues facing the community and in particular those who are most marginalized remain extraordinary. They require extraordinary responses with vision and with actions to match. Low income residents and the DTES as a whole remain at risk of losing what they have and the community they have. We have learned that key to the health of this community and for the health of Vancouver as a whole is to place the first priority on housing for those who are most marginalized and most at risk. The second priority is to support people through the local area planning program to ensure that the neighbourhoods of the Downtown Eastside retain a sense of “home” in the future and not only a place to live. Community arts and culture have a strong role to play here.

Like many of the community, faith, health and social service, education and arts organizations who oppose the current proposal for the Pantages site, the Community Arts Council of Vancouver is very concerned that low income residents of the Downtown Eastside remain at risk of losing what they have and the strong sense of community they built over many decades. In our view, the creativity and compassion of the area’s low income community is why the Downtown Eastside is truly the Heart of our City and a cornerstone of our heritage assets and cultural identity.

Sincerely,

(original signed and sent via postal mail)

Nathan Edelson, Vice-President and Dara Culhane, Board Member Community Arts Council of Vancouver

Leave a Comment

Filed under More Social Housing, Stop Gentrification

Carnegie Community Action Project (CCAP) Newsletter – Aug 1

Coast Salish Territories                                               Aug 1, 2011

DTES community works to stop condos at Pantages and to get 100% social housing

These groups have endorsed the community resolution calling for 100% social housing at the Pantages site:

Coalition organizers:

Aboriginal Front Door
Carnegie Community Action Project
DTES Neighbourhood Council
DTES Power of Women Group
Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users
Gallery Gachet
Streams of Justice

Endorsers:

1. Indigenous Action Movement
2. Latin-American Collective – Vancouver
3. ACCESS (Association of Chinese Canadians for Equality and Solidarity Society)
4. Harmony of Nations Drum Group
5. Longhouse Ministry Church
6. PHS Community Services Society
7. Lookout Emergency Aid Society
8. Citywide Housing Coalition
9. Purple Thistle
10. Pivot Legal Society

11. Vancouver Catholic Worker
12. Teaching Support Staff Union Social Justice Committee
13. Mosaic @ the Space
14. DTES Neighbourhood Helpers Project
15. Council of Senior Citizens Organization of BC
16. First United Church
17. Oppenheimer Park Ladies Tea Party
18. Vancouver Rape Relief & Women’s Shelter
19. Vancouver Transgender Day of Remembrance Society
20. Spartacus Books
21. Carnegie Community Centre Association
22. Interfaith Institute for Justice, Peace and Social Movements
23. Women Elders In Action Society
24. Vancouver Action
25. St. James’ Anglican Church Social Justice Group
26. End Prohibition Committee
27. DTES Neighbourhood House
28. Jacob’s Well
29. PACE Society
30. Impact on Communities Coalition
31. Jen’s Kitchen
32. Western Aboriginal Harm Reduction Society
33. Solidarity Notes Labour Choir

We’ve had a mini victory!

It’s day 27 since we shut down the unsafe demolition site at the Pantages. Thanks to the DTES Neighbourhood Council and CCAP, inspectors ordered the owner to put up mesh to protect residents of the Regent and Brandiz from contaminated dust, to put in better hoarding to protect pedestrians and to implement better safety equipment and procedures for the workers. The owner’s disregard for the safety of our community does not bode well for the future. Every day that goes by without demolition is one step closer to winning 100% social housing at that site.

Campaign for 100% social housing at Pantages site is growing!

So far 40 groups have signed a community resolution calling for 100% social housing and no condos at 138 E. Hastings.  See the list of the groups above on this post.

These are the groups that are organizing the campaign for 100% social housing:

Aboriginal Front Door, Carnegie Community Action Project, DTES Neighbourhood Council, DTES Power of Women Group, Gallery Gachet, Streams of Justice, Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users.

Worthington Properties has proposed to build 79 condos and 18 social housing units at the site.  They want the bottom floor to be an art space run by a group that includes David Duprey who is involved with the Rickshaw.  The Director of Planning may try to OK the project as soon as August or September.  But planners have told the Carnegie Action Project that if the project is “contentious,” it may go to the appointed Development Permit Board instead.  This would take a bit longer and the Development Permit Board hears members of the public.So far the actions taken to preserve the site for 100% social housing include painting the building with the community’s vision for the site, shutting down the demolition of the buildings on the site because it was being done unsafely, forming a coalition to organize the campaign, getting groups to endorse the community resolution to stop the condos and build 100% social housing, and getting petitions signed by neighbourhood residents (so far about 1200 signatures have been collected).

The coalition also organized a news conference with about 40 supporters at the office of Studio One architects, the architect for the condo project.  Right now the coalition is urging everyone concerned to email

mayorandcouncil@vancouver.ca
Writing the letter is simple and only takes a few minutes!

  • State your firm opposition to the developer’s proposal for 79 condos at 138 E. Hastings.
  • State the low income community in the DTES is against this project and condo development
  • List some of the reasons for opposition, for example:
    • People in the DTES need social housing and can’t afford condos;
    • Condos cause gentrification which pushes up rents in hotels and brings in businesses that exclude low income residents with high prices and security guards
    • Condos in the 100 block of E. Hastings are especially bad because nearly 400 SRO residents live in that block and could be pushed out if gentrification pushes up their rents;
    • Building more social housing as well as defending and preserving our DTES community are more important – and more life saving – than letting developers make millions in the DTES.
For more information, check out this website:

http://dtesnotfordevelopers.wordpress.com/aboutpantages/

More actions are planned for August and September.

Stop condo project say DTES residents

For Immediate Release to all media:
(Vancouver Coast Salish Territory)

Stop condos in the Downtown Eastside (DTES) until we have decent housing for the low income residents who live there now. That was the message that low-income DTES residents and their supporters brought to Studio One Architects today at 11 am.

“Housing first for the people who need it,” said Anne Marie Monks, social housing resident who was recently homeless and board member of the DTES Neighbourhood Council. “The rich can buy somewhere else. They can go up to Whistler. DTES belongs to the people.”

“I only know one person who lives in a condo and she lives in Winnipeg. Their world is totally different than mine. We need social housing here, not condos,” said Sandra Pronteau, another social housing resident and member of the Carnegie Community Action Project.

Studio One Architects has submitted a development proposal to the city for 79 condos, 18 more condos that would be sold to a non-profit group, and commercial space on the bottom floor. The development would be at 138 E. Hastings, bringing gentrification to the heart of the DTES.

Forty (40) groups support a community resolution calling on the Pantages developer to sell his lots at this site to the city for the 2010 assessed value of $3.7 million. The resolution calls for 100% community controlled social housing at the Pantages site. Over 1100 additional people have signed a petition calling on the owner to sell the Pantages site to the city for the 2010 assessed value. At the action today DTES residents and groups called on the architects to withdraw their proposed development.

“Condos displace low income residents by pushing up land values and hotel rents,” said Fraser Stuart, SRO resident who was recently homeless and board member of the DTES Neighbourhood Council. “The city has promised that low income residents won’t be displaced but they are ignoring that promise. We still have hundreds of homeless people in our neighbourhood, and 5000 SROs that need to be replaced with decent housing low income people can afford.”

“We have a right and a responsibility to protect our neighbourhood from changing into a rich neighbourhood. Most people don’t know what is happening at these demolition sites and by the time they do, it will be too late,” said Kim Pacquette, social housing resident and member of the Carnegie Community Action Project.

Dave Diewert of the interfaith social justice group Streams of Justice said: “The utter disregard for the health and safety of workers, adjacent residents and pedestrians during demolition, and the architects’ poor-bashing rhetoric of social mix that accompanied the visual of Sequel 138 on their website, reveal the developer’s distain and contempt for the current residents of this community, and confirms the conviction that the project will only bring harm not benefit to the neighbourhood.”

“We have already stopped the demolition at the site,” said Beatrice Starr, of the Downtown Eastside Women’s Centre Power of Women. This community will use whatever ways we can to stop this project. It won’t be easy for the developer to put condos here.”

City Council sets up Task Force on SRO Maintenance

On July 14 City Council voted to set up a Task Force on maintenance standards in hotels.  The motion came two weeks after the Carnegie Community Action Project, DTES Neighbourhood Council, VANDU and tenants of the Wonder and Palace Hotels spoke to council about deplorable conditions in those two buildings and others.

At the Council meeting DNC volunteer Richard Marquez, who has been helping Wonder tenants find decent housing, spoke about the Code Enforcement Outreach Program in San Francisco.  With that program hotel tenants get stipends to work with community groups and city property use inspectors to keep building maintenance standards up to par.

Al Fowler, a former Wonder Rooms tenant, told Council that tenants should be on the Task Force and about how hard it is to find an affordable place to stay.

Jean Swanson of CCAP put forward recommendations of the DNC, CCAP and VANDU that the Task Force should include these groups:  Power of Women, DNC, VANDU, CCAP, Western Aboriginal Harm Reduction, TRAC, Aboriginal Front Door, Pivot, Native Health, and SRO tenants.  She also said that it should recommend procedures, policies and bylaws the city will implement to upgrade living standards in SROs.  Councillor Ellen Woodsworth amended the motion to include these points and they were accepted.

So….soon we should have a Task Force on SRO maintenance and maybe it could have some good results.

Council also passed another resolution on the same day to set up a working group with a number of professional groups and “other stakeholders” to address alleged abuses at the Wonder and Palace Hotels.

Vivienne  Bessette of VANDU told Council that the methadone treatment system has failed because no consumer groups have been there to talk about the abuses.  “If the [working group] doesn’t include users it could do more harm than good.”  She added, “VANDU is expert in addictions.  Doctors are not always experts in addiction.”

Charlie Boyle of the BC Association of People on Methadone also argued that methadone users should be included in the methadone working group.

Dave Murray said there were 2000 Downtown Eastside residents on methadone and 11,000 in the province.  He said that VANDU and BC APOM have to be on the working group.  This time, however, the motion was not changed to add in the two groups.  Although Councillor Kerry Jang said in his remarks that they would be consulted.  So, the city is now going to have a working group on methadone maintenance abuses that is dominated by professionals and where user groups will hopefully be consulted. ~js

This task force wouldn’t have happened without the work of Ivan of CCAP and residents of the Wonder and Palace Hotels who, at a previous council meeting, spoke out at council and launched a class action suit against the landlords.

Leave a Comment

Filed under CCAP Reports